In Reply to: Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! posted by Darren on December 19, 2000 at 02:06:32:
Compared to the 92/2067s INSTANT TONE FIND ,its Sllloooow.Compared to a 895,i dont know,i havn't used the 895.Either uniden made the 780s TONE search perform the same as the 895,or better,buti'm almost certain no worst.Is the TONE SEARCH on the 895 slower than the instant 92/2067 or the same?
Compared to the 92/2067s INSTANT TONE FIND ,its Sllloooow.
Compared to a 895,i dont know,i havn't used the 895.
Either uniden made the 780s TONE search perform the same as the 895,or better,buti'm almost certain no worst.
Is the TONE SEARCH on the 895 slower than the instant 92/2067 or the same?
Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! Rich Wells, N2MCA 11:40:49 12/19/00 (12) Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! DaveH 21:44:05 12/28/00 (0) Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! Curt Chambers - N9PHL 16:37:20 12/20/00 (1) Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! Rich Wells, N2MCA 15:22:33 12/22/00 (0) Re: THE 780s Tone Search is THE WORST! JOHNNY D 12:44:03 12/19/00 (8) Re: Ugh! Pogo 19:07:49 12/19/00 (7) Re: Ugh! Josey 21:09:34 12/20/00 (6) Re: Ugh! BC 18:54:31 12/23/00 (0) Re: Ugh! Pogo 20:30:02 12/21/00 (0) Re: Ugh! Ben S 12:59:59 12/21/00 (3) Re: Ugh! Todd S 15:31:25 12/21/00 (2) Re: Ugh! Josey 15:39:30 12/21/00 (1) Re: Ugh! Todd S 14:08:30 12/22/00 (0)